Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer:
Top line: y = (2/3)x + 2
Bottom line: y = (2/3)x -1
Discussion:
The graph provided is hard to read but I did the best I could.
The top line appears to pass through the points (0,2) and (-3,0)
For this line
m = change y /change x = (0-2)/(-3-0) = -2/-3 = +2/3. So
y = mx + b => y = (2/3) x+ b. As the line passes through (0,2) set x = 0, y= 2 in y = (2/3)x + b =>
2 = (2/3) 0 + b => b = 2
Therefore y = (2/3)x + 2
The bottom line appears to pass through the points (0,-1) and (3,1)
For this line
m = change y /change x = (1-(-1)) /(3-0) = +2/-3. So
y = mx + b => y = (2/3) x+ b. As the line passes through (0,-1) set x = 0, y= -1 in y = (2/3)x + b =>
-1 = (2/3) 0 + b => b = -1
Therefore y = (2/3)x + -1
Thank you,
MrB
Answer:
No,
Step-by-step explanation:
No, it's irrational.
Because, it is a non-terminating non recurring type number.
Answer:
Yes, it is appropriate
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
See attachment for pie chart
Required
Is the pie chart appropriate
The attached pie chart displays the distribution of each of the 4 genre. The partition occupied represents the measure of each genre.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Resolving Parenthesis
Collecting like terms
Dividing both sides by 2
