The three concerns that the residents of this area might be:
1) <span>The cost of not moving forward is extremely high, so they opposed the plan, as they think it would affect US economy
2) </span><span>Nuclear waste disposal capability is an environmental imperative, so their environment would be polluted by very radioactive materials.
3) </span>Demand for new nuclear plants also demands disposal capability which supports national security but again, their site will be no longer for them. But unfortunately, <span>Extensive studies consistently show Yucca Mountain to be a sound site for nuclear waste disposal so the plan can't be abolished.
Hope this helps!</span>
Explanation:
The absolute value of the difference in electronegativity (ΔEN) of two bonded atoms provides a rough measure of the polarity to be expected in the bond and, thus, the bond type. When the difference is very small or zero, the bond is covalent and nonpolar. When it is large, the bond is polar covalent or ionic.
Electrons in a polar covalent bond are shifted toward the more electronegative atom; thus, the more electronegative atom is the one with the partial negative charge. The greater the difference in electronegativity, the more polarized the electron distribution and the larger the partial charges of the atoms.
The molecules in system #2 have a higher kinetic energy because they are at a higher temperature than molecules in system#1.
<h3>Heating of water molecules</h3>
Temperature is defined as a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules of a body. The higher the temperature of a body, the higher the kinetic energy of the molecules of the body.
In both systems, we have water molecules that have the same formula H2O. However, the molecules in system #2 have a higher kinetic energy because they are at a higher temperature than molecules in system#1.
Learn more about kinetic energy of molecules: brainly.com/question/2731193
