Ask question

Ask question

All categories

kakasveta [241]

3 years ago

5

You just finished paving a rectangular driveway measuring 75 feet by 20 feet. You charged the customer $1,000. After deducting t

he expenses shown below, how much profit did your company make on this job?

1 answer:

Alchen [17]3 years ago

3 0

The company made 292.5

You might be interested in

What is the value of the expression when a = 4, b = 3 , and c = 10?

daser333 [38]

Answer:

3a4b-c

3(4)4(3)-10

12(12)-10

144-10

=134

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write 1,200 in scientific notation

iVinArrow [24]

Answer: 1.2 10x ^3

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I will follow you please give me correct answer

Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

y=1/3, x=4/9

y=8, 32/3

x=9, y=27/4

y=20, x=80/3

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

shi x, miao w, and tchetgen tchetgen ej. (2020). multiply robust causal inference with double negative control adjustment for ca

fomenos

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

What is unmeasured cofounding?

By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.

Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:

brainly.com/question/10863424

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago

Help. Please. Thank You.

GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

$(A)\ a=-6;b=4\\\\ (B)\ a=6;b=-4$

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the line in Slope-Intercept form is:

$y=mx+c$

Where "m" is the slope and "c" is the y-intercept.

By definition:

1. If the lines of the System of equations are parallel (whrn they have the same slope), the system has No solutions.

2. If the they are the same exact line, the System of equations has Infinite solutions.

(A) Let's solve for "y" from the first equation:

$3x-2y=-1\\\\-2y=-3x-1\\\\y=\frac{3}{2}x+\frac{1}{2}$

You can notice that:

$m=\frac{3}{2}\\\\c=\frac{1}{2}$

In order make that the System has No solutions, the slopes must be the same, but the y-intercept must not. Then, the values of "a" and "b" can be:

$a=-6\\\\b=4$

Substituting those values into the second equation and solving for "y", you get:

$-6x+4y=-2\\\\4y=6x-2\\\\y=\frac{6}{4}x-{2}{4}\\\\y=\frac{3}{2}x-\frac{1}{2}$

You can idenfity that:

$m=\frac{3}{2}\\\\c=-\frac{1}{2}$

Therefore, they are parallel.

(B) In order make that the System has Infinite solutions, the slopes and the y-intercepts of both equations must be the same. Then, the values of "a" and "b" can be:

$a=6\\\\b=-4$

If you substitute those values into the second equation and then you solve for "y", you get:

$6x+(-4y)=-2\\\\-4y=-6x-2\\\\y=\frac{-6}{-4}x-\frac{2}{-4}\\\\y=\frac{3}{2}x+\frac{1}{2}$

You can identify that:

$m=\frac{3}{2}\\\\b=\frac{1}{2}$

Therefore, they are the same line.

3 0

3 years ago