In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
Explanation:
since notre dame was burned down and the lourvses was attacked by Republican soldiers and the people of Paris, who wanted to depose the king and abolish the monarchy. and Louvres was stormed but thosands of gunmen i assume it B
No state can be denied equal representation in the senate.
Answer:
Should the United Sates use a new atomic weapon?
Explanation:
The difference between China and Japan is all in a name/ Nations exhibit 2 worldviews in idetinfying foreigners or their emigrants' descendants
