What is the range of -23, -2.5, 3, -3, 5, 7, -22.5, 17, 12, 1

Consider the right triangle. A right triangles with side lengths 28 meters and 45 meters. The hypotenuse is unknown. What is the

omeli [17]

Answer:

The answer is 53 or Square Root (sqrt) of 2809

Step-by-step explanation:

a^2+b^2=c^2

28^2+45^2=c^2

784+2025=c^2

c^2=sqrt 2809

c = 53

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify the property or rule shown by each equation. 9 divided 1 =9 and 33 times 1 =33

kicyunya [14]

identity property=something times one

5 0

3 years ago

Solve For x Help pleaassee

Mkey [24]

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

C+E=180

14x-8+132=180

14x=180-132+8

14x=56

x=4

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If AB = 12 and CB = 10, then the height of the triangle is:

Ierofanga [76]

AD = DB = AB/2 = 6
$cd = \sqrt{{bc}^{2} - {db}^{2} } \\ cd = \sqrt{64} \\ cd = 8$

3 0

3 years ago

We are conducting a hypothesis test to determine if fewer than 80% of ST 311 Hybrid students complete all modules before class.

Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.881 -0.8}{\sqrt{\frac{0.8(1-0.8)}{110}}}=2.124$

Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.8$

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

Be Careful with the system of hypothesis!

If we conduct the test with the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.8$

$p_v =P(Z>2.124)=0.013$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=110 represent the random sample taken

X=97 represent the students who completed the modules before class

$\hat p=\frac{97}{110}=0.882$ estimated proportion of students who completed the modules before class

$p_o=0.8$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha$ represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v{/tex} represent the p value (variable of interest) 2) Concepts and formulas to use We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is less than 0.8 or 80%: Null hypothesis:[tex]p\geq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.8$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.881 -0.8}{\sqrt{\frac{0.8(1-0.8)}{110}}}=2.124$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

Be Careful with the system of hypothesis!

If we conduct the test with the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.8$

$p_v =P(Z>2.124)=0.013$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

5 0

3 years ago