If you need to indicate the missing ammount of each letter in the grahp then it will be like follows:
For the first case:
A = $9,600 + $5,000 + $8,000 = $22,600$22,600 + $1,000 – B = $17,000
B = $22,600 + $1,000 – $17,000 = $6,600$17,000 + C = $20,000
C = $20,000 – $17,000 = $3,000
D = $20,000 – $3,400 = $16,600
<span>E = ($24,500 – $2,500) – $16,600 = $5,400
</span><span>F = $5,400 – $2,500 = $2,900
</span>And now for the second case:
G + $8,000 + $4,000 = $16,000
G = $16,000 – $8,000 – $4,000 = $4,000$16,000 + H – $3,000 = $22,000
H = $22,000 + $3,000 – $16,000 = $9,000(I – $1,400) – K = $7,000(I – $1,400) – $22,800 = $7,000
<span>I = $1,400 + $22,800 + $7,000 = $31,200
</span>J = $22,000 + $3,300 = $25,300
K = $25,300 – $2,500 = $22,800$7,000 – L = $5,000
<span>L = $2,000</span>
Hello!
Often people put up signs that, that person likes and is interested in. People also can bargain with a person. So if they are leaving because they think the product is to high of a price for them, then you can tell them you can lower the price.
( word of advice, this is a last resort option)
I hope it helps!
The correct answer is that there was $3,080 worth of office supplies purchased during the period.
In order to answer this question you know that the company started with $630 worth of office supplies and ended the year with $460 worth, or $170 less than they started with. The company used $170 of supplies from inventory, so they needed to purchase another $3,080 in order arrive at the $3,250 that we know was the total expense during the reporting period.
Based on the scenario, it is likely that Joe has made a non-programmed
decision in a way of implementing a programmed decision.
A programmed decision is a way of deciding that is easy in
regards of the individual to decide in a certain decision where as a
non-programmed decision is a way of using logic in which there is high risk
level involved in a decision.
Answer:
a. Who should be assigned to chop vegetables?
b. Who should be assigned to wash dishes?
Explanation:
we need to determine the opportunity cost of each employee:
Rahul's opportunity cost of chopping one pound of vegetables = 100 / 20 = washing 5 dishes per hour.
Rahul's opportunity cost of washing 1 dish per hour = 20 / 100 = 0.2 pounds of chopped vegetables.
Henriette's opportunity cost of chopping one pound of vegetables = 120 / 30 = washing 4 dishes per hour.
Henriette's opportunity cost of washing 1 dish per hour = 30 / 120 = 0.25 pounds of chopped vegetables.
Rahul should wash dishes while Henriette should chop vegetables because their opportunity cost of performing these activities is lower.