Ask question

Ask question

All categories

kondor19780726 [428]

3 years ago

6

two masses are attached by a light string and looped over two frictionless pulleys. object 1 has mass 200g and accelerates upwar

ds at the rate of 4.90m/s^2. determine the mass of object 2

1 answer:

Annette [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

F=ma

F=10(mass of object 2-0.2)

F=ma

=0.2×4.9

=0.98N

10x-2=0.98(assume that mass of second object is X)

10x =0.98+2

10x=2.98

X=0.298kg

the mass of second object=298g

t

You might be interested in

A number is written in scientific notation when it is the product of a number less than 10 but greater than or equal to 1 and a

Bess [88]

Answer:

$Mass = 1.99 * 10^{30} kg$

Explanation:

Given

$Mass = 1,990,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000\ kg$

Required

Rewrite using scientific notation

The format of a number in scientific notation is

$Digit = a * 10^n$

Where $1 \geq\ a\geq\ 10$

So the given parameter can be rewritten as

$Mass = 1.99 * 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000\ kg$

Express as a power of 10

$Mass = 1.99 * 10^{30} kg$

Hence, the equivalent of the mass of the sun in scientific notation is:

$Mass = 1.99 * 10^{30} kg$

7 0

3 years ago

A magnetic force can act on an electron even when it A) is at rest B) moves parallel to magnetic field lines C) both of these D)

Kobotan [32]

Answer: A)

Explanation: when an electron is placed in a magnetic field, it experiences a force.

This force is given below as

F=qvB*sinθ

F = force experienced by charge.

q = magnitude of electronic charge

v = speed of electron

B= strength of magnetic field

θ = angle between magnetic field and velocity.

What defines the force exerted on the charge is the angle between the field and it velocity.

If magnetic field is parallel to velocity, then it means that θ=0° which means sin 0 = 0, which means

F = qvB * 0 = 0.

The charge being at rest has nothing to do with the angle between magnetic field strength and velocity.

3 0

4 years ago

A transparent oil with index of refraction 1.28 spills on the surface of water (index of refraction 1.33), producing a maximum o

Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

The thickness of the oil slick is $1.95\times10^{-7}\ m$

Explanation:

Given that,

Index of refraction = 1.28

Wave length = 500 nm

Order m = 1

We need to calculate the thickness of oil slick

Using formula of thickness

$2nt= m\lambda$

Where, n = Index of refraction

t = thickness

$\lambda$ = wavelength

Put the value into the formula

$2\times1.28 \times t=1\times\times500\times10^{-9}$

$t = \dfrac{1\times\times500\times10^{-9}}{2\times1.28 }$

$t=1.95\times10^{-7}\ m$

Hence, The thickness of the oil slick is $1.95\times10^{-7}\ m$

4 0

3 years ago

The nonreflective coating on a camera lens with an index of refraction of 1.29 is designed to minimize the reflection of 634-nm

eimsori [14]

Answer:

minimum thickness of the coating = 122.868 nm

Explanation:

Given data

lens index of refraction = 1.29

wavelength = 634 nm

glass index of refraction = 1.53

to find out

minimum thickness of the coating

solution

we have given non reflective coating

so

we know that minimum thickness of the coating formula

minimum thickness of the coating = Wavelength / 4n

here n is coating index of refraction

so put here both value to get thickness

minimum thickness of the coating = Wavelength / 4n

minimum thickness of the coating = 634 / 4 ( 1.29 )

so minimum thickness of the coating = 122.868 nm

5 0

3 years ago

Why is the contribution of the wavelets lying on the back of secondary wave front zero?

Tresset [83]

Answer:

The contribution of the wavelets lying on the back of the wave front is zero because of something known as the Obliquity Factor. It is assumed that the amplitude of the secondary wavelets is not independent of the direction of propagation, Sources: byju's.com

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers