-2x -9y = -25
-(-4x -9y =-23)
2x = -2
x = -1
-2(-1) -9y = -25
2 - 9y = -25
-9y = -25 -2
-9y = -27
y = 3
(-1,3)
Answer:
C) English
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't really know how to explain it, so I'll show you instead.
For science, there are 6 of 6 correct answers with a 0.5 chance of answering correctly.
So,
0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.016
For English, there are 4 of 4 correct answers with a 0.25 chance of answering correctly.
So,
0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 = 0.004
They will have to study English (0.004) because it is lower than science (0.016).
Answer:
Probability of having broken glass = 0.1933
Probability of not having broken glass = 0.8067
Step-by-step explanation:
The Treatment table in the file attached to the given question is written out and completed below;
Treatment
Response Smashed into Hit Control Total
Yes 16 7 6 29
No 34 43 44 121
Total: 50 50 50 150
Using relative frequencies,
the distribution of responses about whether there was broken glass at the accident for the subjects in this study can be computed as follows:
Probability of having broken glass = 
Probability of having broken glass = 0.1933
Probability of not having broken glass = 
Probability of not having broken glass = 0.8067
Well, we could try adding up odd numbers, and look to see when we reach 400. But I'm hoping to find an easier way.
First of all ... I'm not sure this will help, but let's stop and notice it anyway ...
An odd number of odd numbers (like 1, 3, 5) add up to an odd number, but
an even number of odd numbers (like 1,3,5,7) add up to an even number.
So if the sum is going to be exactly 400, then there will have to be an even
number of items in the set.
Now, let's put down an even number of odd numbers to work with,and see
what we can notice about them:
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 .
Number of items in the set . . . 8
Sum of all the items in the set . . . 64
Hmmm. That's interesting. 64 happens to be the square of 8 .
Do you think that might be all there is to it ?
Let's check it out:
Even-numbered lists of odd numbers:
1, 3 Items = 2, Sum = 4
1, 3, 5, 7 Items = 4, Sum = 16
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Items = 6, Sum = 36
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 . . Items = 8, Sum = 64 .
Amazing ! The sum is always the square of the number of items in the set !
For a sum of 400 ... which just happens to be the square of 20,
we just need the <em><u>first 20 consecutive odd numbers</u></em>.
I slogged through it on my calculator, and it's true.
I never knew this before. It seems to be something valuable
to keep in my tool-box (and cherish always).