Answer:
23X
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It would be option 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because option 1 does not have a irrational number that goes on indefinitely, option three has the square root of 25, which equals 5 meaning it is rational, and the last option also gives us rational choices. Therefore, the only possibility is that it would be option 2.
Answer:
9.9%
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, you would just divide the "other" category and the "total" category and then move the decimal over 2 spaces, because you need to multiply by 100 to turn your answer into a percent, so:
Then once you multiply by 100, or move the decimal to the left 2 spaces, it becomes:
9.9%, which could be rounded to 10% or 9%.
We don't know what the exact p-value is, but we are told that it's as large as 0.005 which is smaller than alpha = 0.05
Since the p-value is smaller than alpha, this means we <u>reject the null hypothesis</u>.
The way you can remember this is "if the p-value is low, then the null must go". By "low", I mean "smaller than alpha".
Recall that the p-value is the probability of observing that specific test statistic, or larger. So the chances of chi-squared being 18.68 or larger is a probability between 0.0025 and 0.005; there's a very small chance of this happening. The p-value is based entirely on the assumption that the null is correct. But if the null is correct, then the chances of landing on this are very small. We have a contradiction that basically leads to us concluding the null must not be the case. It's not 100% guaranteed of course, but it's fairly strong evidence.
In short, the p-value being smaller than alpha = 0.05 means we reject the null.
In order to accept the null, the p-value must be 0.05 or larger.
