All categories

3 years ago

Security markets provide liquidity:________

Business

1 answer:

Keith_Richards [23]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

C. by allowing corporations to raise funds by selling new issues and by creating a market in which owners may easily turn an investment into cash through its sale

Explanation:

Naturally, a security market is seen to permit you do more with your actual savings within your saving periods. It is seen to aid over the counter trading which is seen to occur directly between the trader and the broker. In certain cases that can be termed marketable securities, it is seen to occur due to the maturities are seen to tend to be less than one year; and at such, the buyer/broker rates at which they can be bought or sold have little effect on prices.

You might be interested in

Isaac holds one ton of perishable fruit in storage for Juice Smoothies Corporation. Juice Smoothies does not pay for the storage

FrozenT [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is option b.

Explanation:

Here, when the Juice smoothies does not pay Issac, the selling of fruits is an example of mitigation of damages.

Mitigation of damages can be referred as a contract law under which a victim of breach of law can take actions in order to minimize damages. It means to take any reasonable opportunity possible under the given circumstances to minimize or reduce damages. Though taking extreme actions is not required.

7 0

3 years ago

Most real-world choices aren't about getting all of one thing or another, instead, most choices involve _________________, which

34kurt

Answer:

marginal analysis

Explanation:

it is believed that the rational man makes marginal analysis.

for example, a rational man would continue consumption up to the point that the marginal utility of the last bottle consumed equal marginal price.

If marginal utility falls below price, consumption should stop.

If marginal utility is above price, consumption should continue

4 0

3 years ago

The profits of West Side Grocery have dropped significantly over the last several months. After investigating, the owner realize

zubka84 [21]

Answer: D) poor planning.

Explanation:

It is in the Planning Stage that expectations are penned down. If this is not set out, people will.not know what is expected of them and as such will move with no specified DIRECTION on projects. In such a situation, business objectives can rarely be met.

Indeed, Poor Planning is one of the major causes of LOW PRODUCTIVITY and PROFITABILITY which is what West Side Groceries is currently going through.

3 0

3 years ago

You are the manager of a firm that manufactures front and rear windshields for the automobile industry. Due to economies of scal

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

a. The optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0)

b. Yes, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Explanation:

a. Determine your optimal pricing strategy if you and your rival believe that the new Highlander is a "special edition" that will be sold only for one year.

Note: See the attached excel file for the Representation of one shot normal for of the game played between "You" and "Your Rival" together with the payoffs.

From the attached excel file, the dominant strategy is for “You” and “Your Rival” to charge “Low Price” each. If the dominant strategy is played by “You” and “Your Rival”, the optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0).

b. Would your answer differ if you and your rival were required to resubmit price quotes year after year and if, in any given year, there was a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander? Explain.

When we have a year-after-year competition between “You” and “Your Rival” but with a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander, the payoffs of the firm that continue to comply with the collusive strategy of charging “High Price” by each firm under the normal trigger strategy whereby “You” and “Your Rival” agree to charge high price as long as there is no past deviation by any of the firm, otherwise charge a low price is as follows:

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 + $6(100% - 60%) + $6(100% - 60%)^2 + 6(100% - 60%)^2 …….

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 / 6% = $10

Therefore, what the firm that cheats earn today is $11 million and it earns $0 forever. The implication of this is that $\pi ^{Cheat}$ = $11

Therefore, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Download xlsx

7 0

2 years ago

Terrell urgently needs to take care of some personal business using the internet, but he is afraid that he might jeopardize his

blsea [12.9K]

The answer is electronic monitoring.

In corporations, it is not uncommon to find this policy. What it means is that every single Internet activity that you choose to engage in while using the company’s electronic equipment and Internet connection would be recorded by the company. The purpose of this policy is to discourage employees from using company resources for personal gains.

6 0

3 years ago