1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ElenaW [278]
2 years ago
14

In the 20th century, one of the major economic problems in Spain and

History
2 answers:
Oksanka [162]2 years ago
4 0
The answer is that of D.
Gelneren [198K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Is it more accurate to say that the Texas governor is the state’s “chief persuader” than to say that he or she is the “chief exe
ipn [44]
In my opinion chief executive sounds better 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which resulted from the Senate's not guilty verdict in Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial?
In-s [12.5K]
<span>The correct answer is D. The three branches of government remained equal in power. Because the impeachment failed, there were initiatives and petitions to change the system from having a president with all executive powers, to creating a body of people who shared executive power. This never passed and everything remained the same as normal.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Populists want the United States to move from a currency backed by
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

In 1893, the country was in thrown into a depression that lasted until roughly 1900 from the bursting of the railroad speculation bubble. Populists, who were primarily farmers, wanted to reinstate the system of bimetallism that had traditionally been in place in an effort to inflate the currency to provide them with more cash that could then be used to pay off their debts with cheaper dollars.So, It would increase the supply of money.

Hope I Helped!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should women’s suffrage be a higher or lower priority
Papessa [141]
There’s no correct answer. It’s your opinion
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cracking down on dissent during World War I was part of what larger governmental goal in the United States?
poizon [28]

The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.

Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.  


5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What foreign policy did the United States pursue during the early Cold War?
    5·2 answers
  • A founder of the libertarian party added to the basic political spectrum model by creating the ___________ which added personal
    6·1 answer
  • According to the South African government, what were the locations of the Bantustans based on?
    15·2 answers
  • The bombing of Tokyo was a much-needed morale booster for the United States.<br> True or false?
    15·2 answers
  • Present a brief historical account of the Greek civilization​
    13·1 answer
  • Once again, im clueless
    14·2 answers
  • What was the British East India Company? What was their goal in India? What did they trade?
    5·2 answers
  • Need help asap it’s important please
    5·1 answer
  • What challenges faced the United States after World War I ended?
    6·2 answers
  • Write one paragraph discussing the motivations for and impact of imperialism on European nations. Use the information you learne
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!