Answer:
(1) Knowledge of and experience with analytical concepts, principles, and practices (methods) that provides the ability to analyze and evaluate qualitative and quantitative data to make logical inferences and/or draw logical conclusions.
Explanation:
This could be seen in the ability whereby scientists are trying to gain insight in this current pandemic through analysing and evaluation of the qualitative and quantitative data inorder to be able to find the solution.
Answer:
FIRST: You had tell the person that you were going to start an action against them to be heard in "court". You had to bring witnesses with you so your witnesses could testify that the person was told why you were bringing an action, and that you had given this person a date, time, and location that they had to appear in court to defend themselves.
SECOND: You had to post a written notice near the courthouse that clearly stated the names of both parties, the charges, and the date, time, and location of your first trip to court on this action.
FIRST TIME IN COURT: The first trip gave both parties a chance to speak before a judge. If the judge felt there was enough cause, that judge would assign a trial date. That trial date had to be posted as well.
JURY SELECTION, TRIAL BY JURY: To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age. You had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get paid. Juries were selected from volunteers. The number of jurors could be huge. Some trials had as many as 500 jurors who had volunteered to judge a case. Only the jury could bring in a decision that someone was guilty or innocent. The judge only kept order, but could not decide a trial outcome.
THE TRIAL: Both sides presented their case. Then the jurors voted. Majority ruled.
PUNISHMENT: Punishments varied. If found guilty, both sides, the person bringing the charge and the person being charged, suggested a punishment. The jury could not choose a third choice. They had to choice one suggestion or the other.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think they are all what the class mission statement would reflect, so I guess it depends on what your mission statement is it and what the class is, so like if it was "work hard play harder" you would think oh that class get benefits for working hard yk Im sorry I really hope that helps if you give me a little more information like what class it is or what the mission statement is I could help a little more :)
If the Spanish had been able to invade and conquer England, Philip II would not have allowed religious tolerance for the protestants.
Philip II also known as “Philip the Prudent” was the King of Spain from 1556 to 1598. Under him, the Spanish empire flourished, expanded, and influenced in having religious unity. Madrid was established as the capital in his reign.
He established Religious unity by setting up the Holy league formed by Venice, Geneva, and the Papal states of Spain. The league aimed to defend Christianity against the Berber incursions in the Mediterranean and from the Ottoman empire. The King’s edicts limited the freedom in the use of their language, religion, and culture consequence of the rebellion of the Moors in the Granada al Bukhara.
Learn more about Philip II:
<u><em>https://brainly.in/question/6871626</em></u>
