Answer:he was at -50 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
If he is going 25 feet per minute then you do 25x10 winch is 250 to see how far they have been total then since hes at 200 feet now you subtract 250 from 200 and you get your answer
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
Answer:
36 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
I’m pretty sure that’s it
Answer:
w = 
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Defending the inference and challenge
Step-by-step explanation:
The inference is correct no one chosen math. Most of them choose english, few of them choose history, and only two choose science.
There are 1000 7th grader, since they did not ask them what was their favorite subject. They could of had 65% for math, 25% for english, 5% for science and history. We do not know.
Hopes this help
