Answer:
i wanna say Utopia (number 39 lol)
Explanation:
Just look at him
Answer:
Geographic segmentation
Explanation:
it is strategy related to geographic segmentation. it include strategy to provide all those facilities to the customer on the basis of location of customers. As it is given in question Hilton hotels provide more sleeker rooms in northeastern side while more rustic hotels in southwestern hotels.
In generally speaking, geographic segmentation strategy totally based on the preference of targeted customers.
Example of Geographic segmentation approach include large production of raincoats to those areas that experience heavy rainfall etc
Answer:
the efficiency variance for variable overhead setup costs is $4,810 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the efficiency variance for variable overhead setup costs is shown below;
= ((15,700 ÷ 265) × 4.25) × $45 - ((15,700 ÷ 325) × 3) × $45
= $11,330.6604 - $6,521.5384
= $4,809.12 favorable
= $4,810 favorable
hence, the efficiency variance for variable overhead setup costs is $4,810 favorable
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
