Janea bought a motorcycle for dollars. It depreciates by a factor of each year. Which expression best predicts the value of the car after 10 years?
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Each term has been multiplied by 2/5.
-1/2 * 2/5 = -2/10=-1/5
-1/5 * 2/5 = -2/25
-2/25 * 2/5 = -4/125
-4/125 * 2/5 = -8/625
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
The anwer is B, f(x)=9500-750x
Hope this helps, brianliest if you can!