1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
schepotkina [342]
3 years ago
14

HELP PLEASE 14 POINTS

Social Studies
2 answers:
worty [1.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The bottom one/D

Explanation:

To make sure one group do not have to much power.

Marrrta [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

that no one group has too much power

Explanation:

to ensure separations of power :)

You might be interested in
Identify the three gulfs surrounding the United States, and provide at least one characteristic of each. Make sure to write your
Lesechka [4]
Pacific ocean,the west coast and Alaska are next to the pacifi,the largest body if water in the world

Atlantic ocean, the Atlantic is on the edge of the U.S east coast

gulf of Mexico, the gulf of Mexico is in the midwest region of the U.S and is part of the Atlantic ocean.
8 0
3 years ago
The chief god of the Egyptians was A. Bel. B. Re. C. Osiris. D. Tutankhamun
Allushta [10]

Answer:

C.Osiris

With Osiris, Amun-Ra is the most widely recorded of the Egyptian gods. As the chief deity of the Egyptian Empire, Amun-Ra also came to be worshipped outside Egypt, according to the testimony of ancient Greek historiographers in Libya and Nubia. As Zeus Ammon, he came to be identified with Zeus in Greece.

7 0
3 years ago
One’s consciousness changes as one encounters new experiences. please select the best answer from the choices provided t f
finlep [7]

This is true.

Our consciousness is our awareness of ourselves, others and the world around us. The more we experience throughout life the more we learn and grow therefore our consciousness is expanding and changing everyday.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Electoral collage should be abolished and why
Alex73 [517]

Explanation:

It’s hard to imagine a political institution less suited to a 21st-century liberal democracy than the Electoral College. It arose from a convoluted compromise hammered out late in the Constitutional Convention, and the rise of political parties in the late 18th century and the spread of democratic ideals in the early 19th quickly undermined its rationales. If it didn’t exist, no one today would consider creating it.

But the Electoral College is worse than merely useless. Its primary function is to malapportion political power, and it does so — indeed, has always done so — with strikingly awful consequences. A state is entitled to a number of electors equal to its number of senators and representatives. Before the Civil War, the combination of the Electoral College and the Three-Fifths Clause, counting a slave as three-fifths of a person, gave the Slave Power outsize control in electing the president, with the consequence that antebellum presidents were almost always either slaveholders or at least friendly to their interests (the major exceptions were both named Adams). After the war, every person counted as a full person for apportionment purposes — but with the collapse of Reconstruction and the violent disfranchisement of African-Americans throughout the South, that increase in representation once again redounded only to the benefit of white male power-holders, a situation that was not largely rectified until the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Because a state’s number of electors is based on total population, not actual voters, it gives the states no incentive to enfranchise new groups of people, or to make voting easier for those eligible. And because states want to maximize their influence in selecting the president, they also have a strong incentive to use a winner-take-all approach to awarding electors, which all but two states currently do. The result — as we’ve now seen twice in the last two decades — is that a popular vote loser can be an Electoral College winner.

In a liberal democracy, not everything need be decided by majority vote. But once something is put to a vote, it is hard to understand why the side getting fewer votes should win. And Americans have long understood themselves to be voting for their president, not for presidential electors. It is long past time to get rid of the Electoral College.

by jese wingman

7 0
3 years ago
¿UNA PERSONA NACE CON PREDISPOSICIÓN GENÉTICA PARA DELINQUIR?
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

EL ENGLISH POR FAVOR

(habla usted Inglés)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the location of the palace where the Aztec king lived ?
    13·2 answers
  • The objections to the purchase of the Louisiana territory?
    14·1 answer
  • Communicating openly and honestly is one of the steps to A. redirecting bad behavior. B. engaging in positive self-talk. C. hand
    7·2 answers
  • What is an advantage of using wind for producing electricity instead of coal?
    6·1 answer
  • Prompt
    12·1 answer
  • The_______________ approach to design jobs involves increasing the number of different tasks of similar level that a worker perf
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following amendments is considered to be a protective measurement of individual freedoms and rights?
    12·1 answer
  • Which Middle Eastern nation is governed by a parliamentary democracy?
    7·2 answers
  • Alcoholics Anonymous, an organization that seeks to help alcoholics achieve a sober life, is one example of which type of social
    13·1 answer
  • The degree to which one experiences more negative than positive emotions refers to the _____ factor of the five-factor model.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!