Answer: 
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Answer:
48 meals
Step-by-step explanation:
36lbs ÷ 3/4lbs = 48
You plug in 2x + 4 into the y for the other equation (3x +y ) and solve for it
Answer:
Last choice.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the option that is equivalent to this equation, we can begin by narrowing down our options. The slope contains a negative number, meaning the second point must have a lower y value than the first.
Using this criteria, we can eliminate the first and the third answer. Now, we can test the second and fourth answer.
We can test using the slope formula and plugging in values. When the slope formula: 
We get a slope of -5 for both of these equations. Let's plug in the point values to check whether they work:
Choice 2:
-24 = -5(4) + 4
-24 = -20 + 4
-24 ≠ -16
Choice 4:
-16 = -5(4) + 4
-16 = -20 + 4
-16 = -16
Therefore, choice 4 is correct!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Find two linear functions p(x) and q(x) such that (p (f(q(x)))) (x) = x^2 for any x is a member of R?
Let p(x)=kpx+dp and q(x)=kqx+dq than
f(q(x))=−2(kqx+dq)2+3(kqx+dq)−7=−2(kqx)2−4kqx−2d2q+3kqx+3dq−7=−2(kqx)2−kqx−2d2q+3dq−7
p(f(q(x))=−2kp(kqx)2−kpkqx−2kpd2p+3kpdq−7
(p(f(q(x)))(x)=−2kpk2qx3−kpkqx2−x(2kpd2p−3kpdq+7)
So you want:
−2kpk2q=0
and
kpkq=−1
and
2kpd2p−3kpdq+7=0
Now I amfraid this doesn’t work as −2kpk2q=0 that either kp or kq is zero but than their product can’t be anything but 0 not −1 .
Answer: there are no such linear functions.