Answer:
The effect of this error on 2003 ending working capital is that it overstated the ending 2003 working capital.
The error does not have effect on the 2004 ending retained earnings balance.
Explanation:
Let the amount of the commission expense be xxxx.
At the end of 2003, the journal entries should have been as follows:
Debit Commission expense for xxxx
Credie Commission payable for xxxx
Also, we have:
Working capital = Current assets – Current liabilities ………… (1)
From equation (1), current liabilities are understated because commission payable which was not recorded is an item under current liabilities. Since the current liabilities are understated, that indicates that the working capital in equation is overstated. Therefore, the effect of this error on 2003 ending working capital is that it overstated the ending 2003 working capital.
When the 2003 commission expense in the entries above was paid in 2004, it would have been recognized as an expense. This made the error to counterbalance. This implies that the 2004 ending retained earnings balance is still correct despite that there are errors in the earnings of the two years. Therefore, the error does not have effect on the 2004 ending retained earnings balance.
Here is the answer. Suppose that consumption depends on the interest rate, how this alters the conclusions is that at any given level of the interest rate, national saving falls by the change in government purchases. You should also consider <span>what happens when government purchases increase. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
$5,456
Explanation:
A relevant cost can be defined as the cost that are said to be in form of a future cash cost that is relevant and important to a particular decision.
The relevant cost:
Current market cost 880 liters × Current market $6.20 per liter
= $5,456.
Therefore the relevant cost of the 880 liters of the raw material when deciding how much to bid on the special order will be $5,456
Answer:
The correct answer is option 'B': The 24 hours that comprise a day
Explanation:
For comparison between 2 random variables only those values can be said to be identical that have the same values.
From the given options if we compare Joe and Bill Gates we conclude
1) The 2 person's are not identically limited by wealth as the wealth difference can be large.
2) Similarly they can have a vast difference in their knowledge.
3) Person that has larger wealth and knowledge will naturally have larger influence.
Now since the length of a day is 24 hours and this is a universal truth no matter what the circumstances we conclude that they both are limited by this parameter no matter whatever be the difference between the 2.
