1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natta225 [31]
3 years ago
10

***I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST*****

Business
1 answer:
wariber [46]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

His thinking does NOT have a ethical componet.

HISELF is most affected by his conduct.

You might be interested in
Choose the correct statement(s) below regarding A. the direct write-off method for calculating bad debt expense. B. It is not no
masha68 [24]

Answer: The correct answer is "B, C, and D".

Explanation: All of these are corrects statements regarding the direct write-off method for calculating bad debt expense.

  • This method is generally not consistent with GAAP and accrual accounting.
  • Using this method generally causes an over estimate of accounts receivable in the company's balance sheet.
  • One of the peculiarities of this method is that it only recognizes the expense for bad debts when a specific account is determined uncollectible.
7 0
4 years ago
Benson and Orton are partners who share income in the ratio of 2:3 and have capital balances of $60,000 and $40,000, respectivel
Illusion [34]

Answer:

$44,800

Explanation:

For computation of capital balance we need to find out first total capital, shares, gain and Orton shares which is shown below:-

Total capital = $60,000 + $40,000 + $20,000

= $120,000

Shares = Total capital × Interest rate

= $120,000 × 0.10

= 12,000

Gain = Investment - Shares

= $20,000 - $12,000

= $8,000

Orton Shares = Gain × 3 ÷ 5

= $8,000 × 3 ÷ 5

= $4,800

Capital = Given capital balance + Orton Shares

= $40,000 + $4.800

= $44,800

So, We have applied the above formula.

5 0
3 years ago
When one person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, that pe
Dimas [21]

Answer:

Option A is correct one.

Competing

Explanation:

When one person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, that person is using the conflict-handling intention of <u>Competing.</u>

When one person seeks to satisfy his or her interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, he is competing. The competition involves authoritative and assertive behaviours.

8 0
3 years ago
Imputed interest rules apply to term loans or demand loans in which the interest rate is less than the Applicable Federal Rate (
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

A) Gift loans of $14,000 in which interest foregone is in the form of a gift.

Explanation:

You are free to give anyone any type of gift that is worth up to $14,000, this includes gifts in cash, assets (e.g. car) or gift loans. Any gift above that threshold will result in taxes paid by the person that receives the gift.

The IRS defines gift loans under Section 7872(f)(3) as:

<em>“The term “gift loan” is any below-market loan where the forgoing of interest is in the nature of a gift.”</em>

As long as the forgone interest doesn't exceed $14,000, then no taxes should be paid.

7 0
3 years ago
New Products pays no dividend at the present time. Starting in Year 3, the firm will pay a $0.25 dividend per share for two year
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

You should pay $3.86 to purchase this stock.

Explanation:

Hi, first let me mention that we can find the price of a stock by bringing to present value its future cash flows, in this case, its dividends, therefore we need to bring to present value $0.25 of year 3 and $0.25 of year 4. We also have to bring that constant dividend of $0.75 that the company plans to pay indefinitely, that we can do by using the following formula, discounted at 13%.

PV(4)=\frac{Constant Dividend}{Discount Rate}

Notice that the formula above says PV(4), that is because this formula only brings that perpetual annuity to one period of time before the first payment takes place, therefore this value has to be brought to present value too.

With all the considerations above, this is how everything should look like.

Price=\frac{0.25}{(1+0.13)^{3} } +\frac{0.25}{(1+0.13)^{4} } +\frac{0.75}{0.13} *\frac{1}{(1+0.13)^{4} }

Price=0.17+0.15+3.54=3.86

Therefore, the price of this stock is $3.86

Best of luck.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are most travel itineraries arranged?
    15·1 answer
  • Fran and Robert own 40% and 60%, respectively, of the RF Partnership. Fran is the general partner and Robert is a limited partne
    14·1 answer
  • Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc. just reported earnings after tax (also called net income) of $8,000,000 and a current stock pric
    15·1 answer
  • Dismissal of an employee shortly after a request for a grievance hearing regarding a salary discrepancy with another employee ca
    6·1 answer
  • A taxicab company maintained accurate records of the expenses for one of its automobiles from January 1, 1996 through January 1,
    12·1 answer
  • If one is injured during the process of saving a life, the person who was trying to help is protected by what law?
    5·2 answers
  • Present your business idea. Then explain the problem, the pain, the need this idea is addressing. Your idea should fix a problem
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement?
    5·2 answers
  • Which department would a marketing manager contact to make sure that enough product is on on hand for an upcoming promotion ?
    11·1 answer
  • In order to successfully carry out an acquisition, the managers at Pink Inc. prepared a list of potential target companies that
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!