Answer:
I think D is the one you can pick.
hope this works!
<span>D. to increase rapid construction of railroad lines.</span>
Answer:
Amendment # 6 which is 'Right to a Speedy and Public Trial
'
Explanation:
Here, the action taken by the police is unconstitutional to say the least. The Amendment relevant to this scenario is Amendment # 6 which is 'Right to a Speedy and Public Trial'. Also, the specific text that can be used to dispute or to counter this action under Amendment # 6 is: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense”. In this scenario, Jackie was not informed regarding the accusation for which she was being charged and arrested nor she was provided with the means or assistance to request a lawyer.
Answer:
The answer is b. is a tying arrangement that may be a violation of federal antitrust law.
Explanation:
If Universal Syndication has told television stations and networks that they cannot have the rights to play program (“Friends” rerun), unless they also agree to take packages (i.e., typing of other packages), even though the television stations and networks complain that the packages do not draw viewers ,then Universal Syndication’s requirement for tying (or bundling) might be a violation of federal antitrust law because it (Universal Syndication) could be using monopoly power in one television market as an influence to control competition, and strengthen its monopoly power in another market.
It can be a technique to shorten or make it still at the point of conversation and avoid unrelated issues or situation. It also makes the discussion brief and concise. This provides other people to give their own opinion at a given time. There also might be an allotted time for each people.
