N<span><span><span>3</span><span></span></span>+4<span>n<span><span>2</span><span></span></span></span>+8n−16
hope helped
</span>
Answer:
(D) 
Step-by-step explanation:
One could run this on a computer and verify the best fit through brute force. The more elegant way is, as usual, to think: What are special values of x for an exponential function? Zero, for starters - anything to the power of zero is 1. The function value for x=0 in the table is 10. Which choices A through D are close to 10 for x=0? Well, (C) and (D), the rest is too far. Next, what is the function value for the next easy one, x=1? The table says 30. Which of (C) and (D) is close to 30 for x = 1. It turns out we can safely exclude (C) because 10.84*1.77 is about 19 and that's way too far from 30. Let's check (D): 8.46*3.51=29.7 - that's quite close. Since there is no other candidate left, I bet my money on (D). Feel free to verify closeness for the other values of x if you are unconvinced yet.
Hello :
<span>a point on the y-axis is : P( 0, y)
</span>PA = PB or PA² = PB².... A(7, -7) B(1,1)
(7-0)²+(-7-y)² = (1-0)² + (1-y)²
49+49+14y+y² = 1+1-2y+y²
16y = - 96
y= - 6
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First add 5x to 12x which becomes 17x and subtract 8 from 12 which becomes 4. So the answer is 17x+4!
X+y+z≥627
x=222
y=194
222+194+z≥627
if we solved for z then
z≥221