All categories

3 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST !!!!!

2 answers:

4 0

You can spend money on things you need first instead of the things you want. Most people spend their pay on things that they want rather than getting something they need this leads to financial problems. Another way is to put at least $20 in the bank every paycheck. This way if something bad happens and you need to pay for it then you have the extra money in your bank. Daily spending can be a bad thing because you are constantly spending and never saving money, and life is full of surprises so you need to save money as well for preparation.

Hope this helped. Have a great day!

il63 [147K]3 years ago

3 0

Write your expenses down and get them under control.

Set a budget.

Daily spending can be good and bad.
All depends on how much money daily you’re talking. Consequences and problems will arise if it’s an excessive amount spent. It can be good if it’s under control.

You might be interested in

"The type of retirement plan that gives the employer flexibility as to the amount contributed annually is a(n):"

Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

SEP-IRA

Explanation:

It's a retirement savings plan made by employers including people that are self-employed for the benefit of their employees and themselves. The employer may make tax-deducible contributions for certain employees towards their SEP-IRA

4 0

3 years ago

Consider the elements of cost in Geordie Ltd, namely, the cost of a product, the cost of direct labour and the cost of non-labou

tangare [24]

Answer:

$73.58

Explanation:

Total cost of product = $120

Total cost of product = Cost of material + Direct labor + Overhead

Cost of material = (3 * direct labor) - $6

Overhead = ¾ of Direct labor

Total cost of product = 3DL - $6 + DL + ¾ of DL

$120 = 3DL - $6 + DL + 0.75 DL

$126 = 4.75 DL

Direct Labor = 126/4.75

Direct Labor = $26.53

Material cost = 3 * $26.53 - $6

Material cost = $73.58

3 0

2 years ago

Suppose Congress is considering raising the top federal marginal tax rate from 35% to 40%. Senator Jones believes the elasticity

KIM [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Solution-

According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.

(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.

(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.

3 0

3 years ago

A cover letter may be searched for keywords<br> true or false

Vaselesa [24]

True, it may be searched for keywords

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the expected dividend to be paid in 3 years if yesterday's dividend was $6.00, dividends are expected to grow at a const

kirill [66]

Answer:

D3 = $7.146096 rounded off to $7.15

Explanation:

The dividend growth projected for the stock expects the stock to grow at a constant rate of 6% each year over an indefinite period of time. This means that the $6 dividend paid by the stock in the current year will grow by 6% every year over its life. Thus, the expected dividend to be paid in 3 years will be calculated as follows,

Lets say that the dividend just paid is D0. Thus, the dividend to be paid in 3 years will be D3. So, D3 will be calculated as follows,

D3 = D0 * (1+g)^3

D3 = 6 * (1+0.06)^3

D3 = $7.146096 rounded off to $7.15

5 0

2 years ago