A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Answer:
B. Kings have a divine right to absolute authority over their subjects.
Hope this helps & best of luck!
Feel free to message me if you need more help! :)
Any answer choices you could supply me with?
Christianity, followed by Islam, is the most common religion in this part of Africa.
I usually try to use things like hey girl or what's up try not to make it obvious you don't know their name and/or ask someone who knows them the persons name
