Company A has a sales position with a yearly salary of $42,000. Company B has a similar sales position with a slary of $39,000 plus 1% conmission on yearly sales.
Let x be the amount of yearly sales
Company A has a sales position with a yearly salary of $42,000.
yearly salary = 42,000
Company B has a similar sales position with a salary of $39,000 plus 1% commission on yearly sales.
1% is 0.01
yearly salary = 39,000+ 0.01x
yearly sales is the salary at company A greater than the salary and conmission at company B
A > B
42000 > 39000+ 0.01x
We solve the inequality
39000+ 0.01x < 42000
Subtract 39000 on both sides
0.01x < 3000
divide by 0.01
x> 300,000
For yearly sales > $300,000, the salary at company A greater than the salary and commission at company B
Answer:
the y intercept is 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
I dont know the answer but you may find this helpful:
-1 Quart = 1.13 British litres
-Fluid ounce = 0.028 Brtish litres
-1 gallon = 4.546 British litres
-1 Cup is 0.237 British litres
Now all the mesurments are the same i hope this helps a bit.
Answer:
<h2>y = 54 ✅</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
If the two numbers vary directly, we can use a proportion to find the missing value.
36/4 = y/6
4y = 216
Divide by 4
y = 54
Check
36/4 = 54/6
216 = 216 ✅
Answer: A. Repeated results if the player makes 75% of his shots in the long run.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null distribution is always the opposite of the alternative distribution which in most cases represents the claim or hypothesis which is to be tested or performed. In the scenario given, the challenge is to show that a basketball player has an average higher than that of the NBA. NBA average stands at 75%. The alternative hypothesis is the claim, which is ;
H1 : μ > 75%
THE null is thus :
H0 : μ = 75% ; which means that repeated result of the player will yields an average of 75%
