Answer:
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em><em>u</em>
Explanation:
I think food and medicinal industries should be established in Nepal.Nepal being an agricultural country can advent the manufacture of various food items suitable in each geographical region.On the other hand,Nepal is rich in medicinal matters as the <em>Ayurvedic</em><em> </em>are much convincing and reliable.Instead of exporting such raw medicinal materials and importing the final product,we should give emphasis on its production.
That is right, you would be using "peer" testimony.A man who gives peer testimony may not have ability in a specific field, but rather he or she likely has personal involvement with the current issue. In spite of the fact that peer testimony can without much of a stretch be tested, it can be a capable device in influencing a crowd of people, especially when conveyed or given by a very famous big name.
Answer:
d is the answer because both are benite i mean both the company or business man and goverement
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
