The Above Statement is True and Rigid.
When visibility is low such as light fog, light rain, or nighttime driving, you should double the following distance to a minimum of 4 seconds. This will seem like a large gap between you and the vehicle in front of you.
<h3><u>What is the 4-second following distance rule?</u></h3>
- The four-second rule in driving means you should remain at least four seconds behind the vehicle in front of you. This way, if you have to abruptly stop, there's a better chance of avoiding a collision.
- It's especially important to apply the four-second rule when driving on or in: Slippery, wet, or icy roads
- The space between your vehicle and a large vehicle behind you on a highway should be four seconds at speeds of 46-70 mph, plus one second for every 10 feet of vehicle length
To learn more about road safety rules, click the links.
brainly.com/question/3902437
#SPJ4
Correct Question - If you are traveling at highway speeds and are just 3 seconds back, your following distance may not give you enough room to make an emergency stop if the vehicle ahead of you crashes. Therefore, when driving at highway speeds, plan to follow back 4 or more seconds to give you more time to stop your vehicle in emergency stopping situations.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
I hope the law comepletely neglects health for these implements or as you call them ¨humans¨ but I completely hope that the government who wants to implement a law for humans rights <u><em>BURNS STRAIGHT TO HELL FOR ALL TO SEE</em></u>
Explanation:
Answer:
These droplets of blood are acted on by forces aside from gravity, either being eliminate of a weapon, or spraying from a victim onto a surface. the form and size of those droplets can help to see the positioning of a victim, the sort of weapon used, and therefore the force employed in the crime.
The answer would be $448 per day
Answer:
It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.
Explanation:
For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.
