Answer: Republican and Democratic voters disagree about a lot. But the divide between each party’s members is much wider than simply distinct policy positions and different evaluations of candidates. Each party’s supporters define the terms and stakes of political competition quite differently. Republicans believe they’re battling over two opposing ideologies, while Democrats view partisan conflict instead as a fight between different social groups. Democrats “want the government to run everything and they think the government can fix everything.” Republicans “want people to be personally responsible for their own lives.”The Democratic Party “promotes big government, secularism, elitism and collectivism.” The Republican Party “pushes for cutting the size of the federal government.” Democrats are “quite socialistic, [giving] way too much power to the government.” Republicans are for “fiscal responsibility and conservatism . . . less government, more power to the states, encouraging jobs . . . with less dependency on the federal government.” Democrats “support the poor and middle class.” Republicans “look out for the rich and don’t care about the poor and middle class.” Democrats have “concern for the working class . . . [and have] always worked to help women.” Republicans’ “concern is for people who have money.” Democrats are “the party of the common man.” Republicans are “for rich, mainly white older folks who tend to be quite judgmental, narrow-minded and unconcerned for their fellow Americans.”
The type of fallacy that is being described in the scenario
above is the casual fallacy. A casual fallacy is having to use or conclude
ideas in which cause a certain scenario or experience in which is not even
correctly identified.
