West because it way more hotter
Answer:
TImothy v. Supreme Court
Explanation:
The case revolved around Timothy w, a very smart kid with that is born with a defect in his cerebral palsy , along with cortical blindness. This make him unable to excel and normal trial like any other kids. Even if he is compared to other kids in disabilities class (it is extremely difficult for Timothy to understand visual cues that used by the teachers to teach the materials).
In the end , the board decided to let go of Timothy and deemed him as unfit for education. Timothy's parents brought this case to the court and sue the board , alleging that the board has violated the 14th amendment, <u>especialy under the equal protection clause.</u>
In the end, Timothy and his parents won the case. This led to the creation of <u>Education for All Handicapped Children Act,</u> which prohibit all educational institution to refuse giving education to handicapped children, <u>no matter how severe their condition might be</u>
Maybe to have the same relatives. I'm not sure it's very weird to me.
The answer is A
mark as brainliest if it’s helpful
Answer:
Conjoint Needs Identification
Explanation:
Conjoint needs identification also referred to as conjoint problem identification can be referred to as a structured problem identification interview which involves the coming together of parents and. teachers in order to identify collaboratively the problem of the child.
The example in the question which involves Kara meeting with the teacher and parents to identify the problem of the child is a perfect representation of conjoint needs (problem) identification.
