Answer:
Sequenced steps in growth and development.
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various develop-mentalists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of Sequenced steps in growth and development. These are certain steps in a child's development that must be taken before learning other skills or steps.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Yani was experiencing <u>"Psychological noise".</u>
Psychological noise results from assumptions we convey to discussions, for example, racial generalizations, reputations, inclinations, and presumptions. When we come into a discussion with thoughts regarding what the other individual will state and why, we can without much of a stretch end up blinded to their unique message. More often than not psychological noise is difficult to free ourselves from, and we should basically endeavor to perceive that it exists and consider those diversions when we talk with others.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
This is important because it shows what the statue represents. The statue represents liberty and freedom. This shows that the country is free and allows human rights. The message means that the tired and poor can be picked up and become free. (I am not sure if this is correct or helpful, I am only in middle school. Haha. I hope this helped you!)
