Federally-appointed judges and Supreme Court justices should continue to serve for a tenure of good behavior. Their service should not be limited, like elected officials, because they are not there to protect their jobs.
<h3>What is the tenure of federally-appointed judges and justices?</h3>
Judges and Justices <u>do not</u> serve a fixed term. They are appointed to serve until their death, retirement, or conviction by the Senate after being impeached by the House of Representatives.
Life tenure based on good behavior frees judges from political pressures. Their tenure is not dependent on the whims and caprices of the politicians, whom they are not constitutionally obliged to favor in their judgments.
Thus, while this view remains personal, the Constitution foresaw the dangers of allowing politicians to influence judges, obstruct justice, and destroy the doctrine of separation of powers.
Learn more about the tenure of judges at brainly.com/question/2909526
#SPJ1
An upper house is one of two chambers of a bicameral legislature. The other chamber is called the lower house.
Upper Houses in the world:
- India: the Rajya Sabha
- Pakistan: the Senate of Pakistan
- United Kingdom: the House of Lords
- United States of America: the United States Senate
Can you explain it a bit better?
Answer:
Primary group.
Explanation:
Charles Horton Cooley wanted to have a better understanding of the society and human behavior. He wanted to know the influence of some groups within a society and its impact on the behavior of humans. His major contribution was about primary groups. Cooley described primary group as the first group one gets introduced to and has the most effect on an individual's beliefs, ideas and ideals. Our families and very close friends are part of the primary groups Cooley wrote about. They are essential part of our lives. Even though there has been several evolvement, family and friends play an active role in our behavior and belief.
This is an example of exchange theory.
In sociology, exchange theory has to do with maximizing benefits while also minimizing costs. When applied to Bill and Cathy's situation, they are taking advantage of each other's skills in order to minimize costs - Bill can cook and Cathy can't (so they can prepare food on their own) and Cathy can repair stuff and Bill can't (so they don't have to get a handyman).
