The right answer for the first question..
<em>Specific diagnosis?</em> <u>Alcoholism</u>, <em>diagnosis made from the before actions mentioned, Emily hasn't done the correct schedule for a normal non-alcoholic worker, that tries to effort to get good comments at the job or worries about the abstens</em>
instead of that Emily preffers to asists to social events that don't offer anything useful for her life
As it as mentioned before, these actions are also the synthoms of what is the most common desorder that makes all those actions, the right answe is <u>depression,</u> people tries to hide problems with alcohol, and if they don't stop it will become a dangerous addiction.
Answer:
The effective ingredient was likely quinine from the cinchona tree.
Explanation:
Quinine is obtained from the bark of the cinchona tree and it is used in the treatment of malaria. Malaria is transmitted to humans by several species of mosquitoes. In South America, Malaria is mostly transmitted in rain forest areas in northern countries. Therefore, in the situation we are studying here, the member who became ill might have been infected. The quinine present in the cinchona bark made him feel better.
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
The answer is After the response.
Reinorcement and punishment need to be associated within the person's mind after he/she complete a certain behavior/response.
After it's all associated, that person will develop a tendency to conduct the conditioned behavior because he/she associated that behavior with positive outcome.
