Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).
Answer:
Option # C: 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Decision variables, as the name imply are entities that can have different values in the given scenario and which in turn produce different outcomes. For our question, the variables are the sizes of TVs available, as the production time and profit depend on the sizes. Hence, TV sizes (i.e. 5) are our decision variables.
Furthermore, it does not matter on which machine the TVs are being manufactured as they will take identical time for same TV size. Thus we do not consider the number of machines as our decision variables.
Answer:
See Explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Sample Response: No, the triangle is not possible. The triangle inequality rule states the sum of any two sides must be greater than the third side. 6 + 4 is 10, which is less than 11.
Answer:
(0,3)
Step-by-step explanation:
graph the line using the slope and y-intercept, or two points.
the slope would be- 3/4
graphing it would be (0,3)
Latus rectum is the line segment that passes through the focus, is perpendicular to the axis, and has both endpoints on the curve.
<span />
