Answer:
i think its probably most likely a
Answer:
Normally it would be 40 and anything over 80 hours in a two-week time frame would be considered OT
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1250*.05=62.5. Then just add it to the amount for the total dollars shw needs to spend with tax
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The personal hygiene part of the store (I think)
Step-by-step explanation:
This is an ultimately weird question, so I don't really know. But my answer is what I think, (I don't even know if it exists though).
A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%