Sorry this description is a bit confusing but i couldn't really think of a way to phrase it properly :)
most economists believe that deregulation has the potential to be helpful because the fact that things aren't regulated by the government increases competition in people selling the same wares, which normally ends up lowering the price of that specific good and/or improving the quality of the good drastically (which means more people will be buying, it whatever it may be, which is good for the economy)
Answer: Yes, the distribution between the dividend yield and the capital gains yield would influence the firm’s decision to pay more dividends rather than to retain and reinvest more of its earnings.
Explanation:
Yes, If a company decides to increase its dividend payout ratio, the dividend yield component will rise, but the expected long-term capital gains yield will decline as there is less to reinvest in the company. Also, if the company doesn't pay out dividends, there's more to reinvest in the company. Stable and older companies that are not on a growth objective rely on investors that prefer dividends more than share price appreciation. On the other hand, emerging companies, are inclined to share price appreciation to attract investors. Investors understand that all retained earnings are going towards marketing and growth objectives.
The bundle that is going to maximize profit is going to be Late
<h3>How to find the bundle that would maximize profit</h3>
we have the net profit from early to be 7 + 5 = 12
We have the net profit from late to 6 + 10 = 16
We can see that the value for late is greater at 16 compared to that of the early.
Hence we can say that late has the greatest profit.
Next we have to solve for the profit that is made. This is the net profit.
The solution is given as 16 - 12 = 4
<h3>What is profit maximization</h3>
This is the process where by businesses would try to get the best output possible from the given inputs that they would use in the business. It goal is to be able to maximize the returns that they would make.
Read more on profit maximization here:
brainly.com/question/13464288
#SPJ1
Answer:
If the demand curve for a life-saving medicine is perfectly inelastic, then a reduction in supply will cause the equilibrium price to <u>rise and the equilibrium quantity to stay the same</u>.
Explanation:
Perfectly inelastic demand curve indicates the quantity demanded for the life-saving medicine remains the same or does not change in response to a change in price.
Since a part of the law of supply states that the lower the quantity supplied, the higher the price; a reduction in the supply of the life-saving medicine will increase its price.
The combining effect of the two above will lead to an increase in the equilibrium price while the equilibrium quantity will remain the same as it will not respond to the change in price.
The attached graph explains this more clearly. In the graph, the demand curve DD is used to represent the perfectly inelastic demand curve for the life-saving medicine. Therefore, the quantity remains at q no matter the changes, either increase or decrease, in price. Movement from the supply curve S1 to S2 indicates a reduction in supply of the life-saving medicine which causes an increase in the equilibrium price from Po to P1 while the equilibrium quantity stays at q.
This therefore shows that if the demand curve for a life-saving medicine is perfectly inelastic, then a reduction in supply will cause the equilibrium price to <u>rise and the equilibrium quantity to stay the same</u>.
