Answer:
The fair value of the assets of the identifiable assets of Thompson company are $38 million and the fair value of identifiable liabilities is $6 million. So if we were to find the value of Thompson company just on the basis of identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities we would subtract the identifiable liabilities from the identifiable assets.
38-6= $32 million.
This means that on the basis of Identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities the value of Thompson company is $32 million but they Anderson Company $ 30 million for the company which means that the company has a negative goodwill. The negative good will is the price paid - the fair value.
30 million - 32 million = -2 million
This means that Anderson Company will record -2 million as negative goodwill and this implies a bargain purchase which means Anderson company will record this 2 million as a gain on their income statement.
Explanation:
The primary function of <u>supply chain management</u> system is to provide the managers with increased visibility of the entire logistics process so that they can improve the efficiency.
<h3>What is the
supply chain management?</h3>
In a firm, the supply chain management refers to an operational section that manages the flow of goods, services, tasks and processes that take place from the input of raw materials to the output.
In conclusion, the primary function of any <u>supply chain management</u> system is to provide the managers with increased visibility of the logistics process.
Read more about supply chain
<em>brainly.com/question/14101567</em>
All of the above are marketed
Answer:
warranty liablity account ending balance: 3,510,000
Explanation:
In total, we expect a warranty expense for 6% for each sale distributed among three years.
For the 32,000,000 million sales for 2019 we expect:
32,000,000 x 6% = 1,920,000 warranty expense.
warranty liaiblity
debit credit
beginning 3,370,000
expenditures 1,780,000
warranty expense <u> 1,920,000</u>
balance 3,510,000
Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
