Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
Salutations!
What is unemployment insurance fund?
Unemployment insurance fund is a short term holiday, or consolation where workers do not work due to personal issues, such as: illness, family cases etc.
Hope I helped :D
A) is late recognizing that a recession has begun and conducts expansionary monetary policy.
Answer:
Explanation:
Value assigned to bonds =
Value of bonds without warrants/(value of bonds without warrants+value of warrants)*Issue price
Value assigned to warrants =
Value of warrants/(value of bonds without warrants+Value of warrants)
Value assigned to bonds = 115,200/(115,200+28,800) * 140,000 = 0.8*140,000 = 112,000
Value assigned to warrants = 28,800/144,000 * 140,000 = 28,000
Journal entries:
Dr Cash 140,000
Dr Discount on bonds payable (171,000-112,000) 59,000
Cr Bonds payable 171,000
Cr Paid in capital-Stock warrants 28,000
Answer:
The amount of $71,760 , is offered by the company for the stadium naming rights.
Explanation:
As the total cost for the sponsorship is $78,000 but the cost has 8% revenue for the naming sponsorship. Therefore,
= Amount × % of revenue
= $78,000 × 8%
= $6,240
In order to compute the amount which is offered to pay for the stadium rights, the revenue amount to be deducted from the administrative cost:
= Cost - Revenue
= $78,000 - $6,240
= $71,760
