What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?

Law

1 answer:

nlexa [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

You might be interested in

This is the decision in a civil case regarding what will be made up to the injured

denis-greek [22]

A "tort" is a wrongful act (sometimes called a "tortious" act), other than a breach of contract, that results in injury to someone's person, property, reputation, or the like, for which the injured person is entitled to compensation.

4 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between puff pastries and croissant dough

maw [93]

Puff pastry doesn’t contain any yeast while croissant dough does.

To make puff pastry, you need to make 5 single turns, and to make croissants, you need only 3 single turns.

One more important thing, if you want your croissants perfect, you will need at least 2 days to make them. First you need to make your yeast dough and chill it overnight. On the second day you need to make the turns, and after the dough rests, you can start making croissant.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What risk factor is present while lifting boxes and loading them onto a truck?

tino4ka555 [31]

I think it may be exerting excessive force

3 0

3 years ago

What are the principal noncharacter uses "other crimes" evidence?

Thepotemich [5.8K]

Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is available for "non-character purposes," such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake/accident.

brainliest? (❁´◡`❁)

8 0

3 years ago

Why have courts changed their treatment of young offenders since the early 1900s?

lesya692 [45]

I think the answer is b they have focused on ways to help young offenders instead of punishing them

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers