What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?

Law

1 answer:

nlexa [21]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

You might be interested in

Which of the following is an example of a standard drink

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

In the United States, one "standard" drink (or one alcoholic drink equivalent) contains roughly 14 grams of pure alcohol, which is found in: 12 ounces of regular beer, which is usually about 5% alcohol. 5 ounces of wine, which is typically about 12% alcohol. 1.5 ounces of distilled spirits, which is about 40% alcohol.

Explanation:

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the "employment-at-will" doctrine? What are the exceptions to this doctrine

snow_lady [41]

The three major common law exceptions are public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith. ... The most widely recognized common law exception to the at-will presumption protects employees against adverse employment actions that violate a public interest.

6 0

2 years ago

For several weeks Bates used his noisy power lawn mower every Sunday morning at sunrise. Several neighbors asked him to mow his

user100 [1]

Answer:

well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.

Explanation:

A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.

B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.

C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.

with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.

please make me brainliest.

4 0

2 years ago

HURRY I NEED HELP RIGHT AWAY !!!!!

Aneli [31]

Declaration, the United Nations Charter, and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights play in establishing international human rights law. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was published in 1948, and it was this document that outlined the concepts that eventually made human rights a part of international law.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>

Generally, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, established the principles by which human rights have been codified into international law in the years thereafter.

In conclusion, A person's human rights are inherent in his or her humanity; no state grants them. No matter where we come from, what we look like, what religion we practice, what language we speak, or any other distinction we could have, we all have the same inalienable rights.