Explanation:
The long-running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In-depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication
Answer:
That statement is true.
Explanation:
Basically, You put your money in saving if you intended to use that money for future consumption. You put your money in investment if you intended to make financial gain out of it.
For example,
Let's say that you want to buy a laptop that cost $700. You only able to spend $350 per month since you have to consider other more important payment such as rent or food. So you set aside $350 for two month and purchase the laptop at the end of the second month. This is an example of saving.
In another case let's say that you put that $350 in Bonds rather than purchasing laptop. You Let that bond mature and take a 3% interest as profit. Two month later, the value of your money is increased. This is an example of an investment.
What this agent has to do should be to advise the buyer that there may be special assessments levied against property.
<h3>Who is a house agent?</h3>
This is a person that acts as a third party to a person that wants to buy or rent a house and the person that is giving out the property.
The agent here has to tell the buyer that the reason for these taxes is the fact that there are other levies on the property.
Read more on house agents here:brainly.com/question/13957036
Answer:
The annualized return is 14.82%
Explanation:
The formula for annualized return is given as Annualized return = (1+ holding return)12/n - 1
Holding return is 8.4%
n is the holding period of 7 months
Annualized return =(1+0.084)^(12/7)-1
Annualized return =14.82%
It is wrong to simply calculate annualized return as 8,4%*12/7,which means one is taking the interest to annual interest by proportional method,as this gives 14.40%, in investment every basis point counts.
The difference between the two figures is 0.42% which could translate into millions depending on the amount invested as well as the duration of investment
