Answer:
Nope! these ratios do not form a proportion
Step-by-step explanation:
if you use a calculator to divide 10/9, you get 1.111 repeating.
if you use a calculator to divide 17/15, you get 1.133 repeating.
<em>since 1.111 does not equal 1.113, </em><em>these ratios are not proportional. </em>
I would go with D, it looks like it is the most linear out of the rest, Hope it helps:)
Answer:
A. 34°
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
Equality Properties
<u>Trigonometry</u>
- [Right Triangles Only] SOHCAHTOA
- [Right Triangles Only] tanθ = opposite over adjacent
- Inverse Trig
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<em>Identify variables</em>
Angle θ = <em>x</em>
Opposite leg AC = 24
Adjacent leg CB = 35
<u>Step 2: Solve for </u><em><u>x</u></em>
- Substitute in variables [Tangent]:

- Inverse Trig [Tangent]:

- Evaluate:

- Round:

Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
In this particular scenario, based on the numbers I would say that it does not make sense to represent this with a constant rate. That is because in a span of three years the change between each year is completely different, for example, between the first and second year there was a change of
9.75 - 8.50 = 1.25 dollar change
1.25 / 8.50 = 0.147 or a 14.7% increase
Between the second and third year, there was a change of
12 - 9.75 = 2.25 dollar change
2.25 / 9.75 = 0.23 or 23% increase
Therefore, each year the percent and dollar value increase is increasing more and more which would not be a constant rate.