Answer:
The correct option is;
comparing plant survivorship in areas where hikers stay on the trail with plants where hikers leave the trail
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis that the area formerly covered by known plants which is now bare soil due to trampling in the alpine areas by hikers can be tested by means of comparing the areas where during the cause of their visit, the hikers remain on the trail as they move within the park to other portion of the park where it is known that there are either very few or no hiker remain on the trail. The outcome will determine if the cause of the appearance of bare soil is due to the transit and trampling by hikers.
The half of 62 = 62/2
= 31
:|
To solve the question we use the compound interest formula which is given by:
A=p(1+r)^(nt)
where:
A=future value
p=principle
r=rate
n=number of terms
t=time
thus plugging in the values in the formula we shall have:
A=835(1+0.04)^(4t)
simplifying this we get the sequence:
A=835(1.040)^(4t)
Thus the answer to the sequence will be:
A=835(1.040)^(4t)
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
1. PQ║TS, PQ ≅ TS, PT and QS are transversals to the parallel lines . . . given
2. ∠P ≅ ∠T . . . alternate interior angles at PT
3. ∠Q ≅ ∠S . . . alternate interior angles at QS
4. ΔPQR ≅ ΔTSR . . . ASA postulate
_____
You can use any pair of angles together with the sides PQ and TS. If you use the vertical angles and one of ∠T or ∠S, then you must invoke the AAS postulate for congruence, as the side is not between the two angles.
<u><em>Answer: =-7.5+20y</em></u>
Step-by-step explanation:
distributive property: a(b+c)=ab+ac
a=-2.5, b=3, c=8y
-2.5*3-(-2.5)*8y
3(-2.5)-8(-2.5)y
simplify by equation.
3(-2.5)-8(-2.5)y=-7.5+20y
=-7.5+20y
Hope this helps!
Thanks!
Have a great day!
