Answer:
Conjunction Fallacy.
Explanation:
Conjunction Fallacy is a faulty reasoning which occurs when one assume that a conjunction of two reasons is more probable than one of the two reasons or occurring of those two events separately.
This further brings to fallacy when one assumes that complex details are more presumed to be true than the general ones. This fallacy is also known with other name, that is, Linda Problem.
So, the correct answer is Conjunction Fallacy.
Answer:
No, because follow-up tests conducted by others cannot verify it.
Explanation:
Science relies so much on careful consideration of results and methods by which results are gotten. This means that a scientific result is as important as the method and its authentic source of origin.
Answer:
illustrated that it is a political body.
Explanation:
Supreme Court refers to a federal court and it's known to be the highest court in relation to the hierarchy of courts in the judicial branch. Therefore, it is referred to as the ap-ex court. Generally, the Supreme Court comprises of nine (9) justices (a chief justice and eight (8) associate justices). These nine (9) justices are appointed only by the president and subsequently confirmed by the senate after screening them diligently.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was a litigation or court case between the Citizens United and the Federal Election Commission with respect to the electioneering and campaign process.
In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court illustrated that it is a political body.
However, the Supreme Court lifted restrictions for corporate and union spending during federal election campaigns.
Answer: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks goes to God, the unconditional love and support of my wife, parents and extended family, my dissertation committee, Alex, the institutions of the United States of America, the State of South Carolina, the University of South Carolina, the Department of Political Science faculty and staff, the Walker Institute of International and Area Studies faculty and staff, the Center for Teaching Excellence, undergraduate political science majors at South Carolina who helped along the way, and the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict. This work was partially supported by a SPARC Graduate Research Grant from the Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of South Carolina and the Sueng Yeun Kim dissertation grant from the Center for Asian Studies at the Walker Institute. I would especially like to acknowledge approximately half of Earth’s population currently living under some form of non-democracy. This work is not intended to disparage you or your country or your culture in any way shape or form. This work is designed to 1) help foster understanding and cooperation between people that reside in democracies and those that live in dictatorships, 2) highlight nonviolent approaches to governance that can hopefully prevent some of the atrocities that tend to occur more often in dictatorships, and 3) move us further along in the quest for a universal understanding of good governance. Henry, remember that knowledge is one thing that no person and no government can ever take away from you. Acquire as much of it as you possibly can.
Explanation:
Answer:
day of the dead i believe
Explanation:
