In the context of intercultural competence, critical scholars emphasize the: context in which communication occurs.
c) context in which communication occurs.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Intercultural competence is an area of cognitive, affective, and behavioural abilities that guide to efficient and relevant communication with people of different cultures. Intercultural communication competence (ICC) is the capability to interact efficiently and properly in several cultural contexts.
There are various elements of ICC. Some key elements comprise motivation, oneself and different knowledge, and tolerance for conjecture.
Intercultural skills are important to companies for several reasons. They do not just provide help a greater recognition of their workplace and colleague, but they also support them adjust to a new work atmosphere and counter-culture shock.
The judicial branch has the power to try criminal case by jury. A jury is a group or body of people usually 12 in number, sworn to give a judgement or verdict in a legal case based on the evidences passed and assessed to them in the court. Hearing cases are done by jury trial or trial by jury. A trial by jury is a legal proceeding wherein the jury will either makes findings or makes verdict of fact which then direct the action of a judge. The juries are distinguished from a bench trial whereby a judge or a panel of judges make all the findings and or decisions.
Answer: Walking Green is an example of a CITIZEN-ACTION PUBLIC.
A citizen action public can be defined as a situation or a scenario whereby the decision of a company is being challenged by the the public which can be the consumers or any group that contribute significantly to the marketing success of the company.
The act of Walking Green challenging Kelstone Developers is an act of citizen action public.
Answer:
<em><u>Aggrieved entitlement</u></em> is a gendered political psychology that authorizes violence by entitling boys and men to exact revenge on others when they perceive their masculinity to have been threatened or otherwise inaccessible.
Explanation:
The term <em>"aggrieved entitlement"</em> is used to refer to the male gender who have the psychological mind that they are entitled to feelings of exacting revenge on others if their masculinity is threatened or questioned. This means that such perpetrators feel entitled to cause violence and justified the 'punishment' they gave others.
This term was used by Michael Kimmel to refer to the dominant white men who have the mentality that their rightful place as men is being questioned. This mentality is when they feel that their 'masculinity' is being deconstructed, or challenged.
