1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Varvara68 [4.7K]
3 years ago
12

What your rules would be for immigrants coming to the United States?

Law
2 answers:
Karolina [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

There would be 2 rules.

Explanation:

  1. Theres no racism. As far as Im concerned, racism is illegal in this state.
  2. theres no buying land. the land is free for everyone and everything to roam on!
mr_godi [17]3 years ago
4 0

Don't break the law, Come here legally, and if you break the law you will be deported back to whatever country you came from.

You might be interested in
What does the acronym CAPOW Stand for? Why is it important conducting research for a speech?
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

It should be stated clearly toward the beginning of the speech. What does CAPOW Stand for. Currency, authorship, purpose, objectivity, writing style.

7 0
3 years ago
. Can "hate" speech kill. Please explain.
Kipish [7]

Answer:

No. Hate Speech in itself cannot kill. However, it is the actions in which the person who hears the speech that can kill.

There is a saying: "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never break me."

In a sense, this saying is partly true, partly false. Words cannot have a physical impact in the beginning stages, but has more of an emotional charge and a mental impact. Depending on the words, if it is positive and from a trusted source, it generally gives a rush of ecstasy that you have done well. However, on the other hand, if it is from an untrusted source, you may be thankful, but still on guard. It cannot be said the same for the opposite. Negative words denoted from a trusted source may cause a grain of salt, but would be looked upon for consideration, while an untrusted source will be untrusted in the information provided already in the source, rather than straight to the statement. Remember, if you trust a source, you rarely question whether or not the event is true or not, you just take their word for it (hence, trust). But if you do not trust, you will research and prod to see if what they are saying is reasonably true or not.

In this case, we are talking about hate speech. Hate speech as defined by Oxford Languages is "abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group...". Let us look at it from a couple of perspectives:

1) The Hate Speech is aimed at a third party, and is given towards the general public. This hate speech calls for a violent effort to destroy the group.

Yes. In this case, there is not only a mental attack, but also a physical and emotional attack. The violent effort implies that there will be beatings, robberies, killings, and all the physical violence that comes with it. This part is a definite "kill". The next part is the psychological and mental part. Those who survive will live and remember this event. Typically, it will draw one of two reasonings from them. The First one, is fear, typically for one's own life. Seeing the outcome for their family members, and then continuing to see the government to be in power will lead to the fear for one's own life. The second reasoning is revenge & hatred. This one comes in two parts. The hatred of the group is inevitable as a human, however, the revenge can come in different ways. Some people will take physical revenge in attacking the source. Others may call for help (psychological revenge) and use a typically 3rd party to exact their revenge. The last one, and the hardest, is to forgive.

2) The Hate Speech is aimed from one party to another directly.

This generally can lead to killings, especially with groups that are weaponized and war mongering. Examples can typically be found in warring, unstable states, gangs, and criminal groups. The leaders typically use hate speech in a way to degrade their enemies, which could lead too two things: A blood lust of the enemy to enact revenge on what is said, or an exchange of words that can still lead to physical violence. In this case, both parties are armed, ready and <em>willing</em> to fight, and have a large ego that must be defended when disgraced. This type of hate speech can lead to killing.

3) Hate Speech in the general public.

Whether as a joke or not, we can all agree that there are hate speech in the public, whether it is more apparent in some areas or not. As protected by the First Amendment of Free Speech, this type of Hate Speech does not account for killings. However, that is not too say that it holds the potential for murders. Speech can be defined as articulated sounds that are expressed through the mouth, however, we must understand that there is other ways to show one's emotions. Words typically leads to actions, and it may force those who feel either pressured or 'attack' to physically strike or argue back. In these cases, when it escalates, there is a high probability of somebody dying, and a even higher probability of damage and wounds.

Remember, hate speech in itself is simply words spoken from the mouth. However, the actions in which someone takes when hearing these words are what can kill. Hate speech in itself does not kill.

8 0
3 years ago
Which department of the United States government is primarily responsible for issues related to foreign relations
WARRIOR [948]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Trust me

3 0
3 years ago
A woman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. The crime scene was
eimsori [14]

Answer: (B)

Explanation: they police do not need a search warrant because the house is a valid crime.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the drug supply chain security act (dscsa) manufacturers now have to have product id on products they distribute in the su
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

The Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), was enacted by Congress on November 27, 2013. Title II of DQSA, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA), outlines steps to achieve interoperable, electronic tracing of products at the package level to identify and trace certain prescription drugs as they are distributed in the United States. This will enhance FDA’s ability to help protect consumers from exposure to drugs that may be counterfeit, stolen, contaminated, or otherwise harmful. These requirements will also improve detection and removal of potentially dangerous drugs from the drug supply chain to protect U.S. consumers.

Additionally, the DSCSA directs FDA to establish national licensure standards for wholesale distributors and third-party logistics providers, and requires these entities report licensure and other information to FDA annually.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following terms indicate that a law enforcement officer has reasons to believe that a law is being violated?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in ______ but not ratified until _____.​
    9·1 answer
  • The organ procurement and translate new yorker divides the usa into ____ gerogphic regions
    9·1 answer
  • When is a statement against interest also a hearsay?
    11·1 answer
  • Personal Injury Protection helps pay for eligible expenses such as medical, funeral, disability, and_________.
    7·2 answers
  • I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLEST IF YOU ANSWER FIRST
    8·1 answer
  • Officer Smith is out patrolling his beat on foot (foot patrol). He notices 2 young men matching the description of 2 suspects th
    10·1 answer
  • Answer will get brainliest!!
    10·1 answer
  • RIGHT ANSWERS ONLY PLS
    5·1 answer
  • Why does the growth of international trade lead to a rising global standard of
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!