Area of pool edge = Area of big rectangle - Area of the pool
Area of pool edge = Area of the pool = 40 × 60 = 2400 ft²
2400 = Area of big rectangle - 2400
Area of big rectangle = 2400 + 2400
Area of big rectangle = 4800
Length × width = 4800
From the diagram, we need the length to be [x + x] more than the length of the pool, where x is the distance from the pool edge to the patio edge.
We also need the width of the big rectangle to be [[x + x] more than the width of the pool.
Length = 60 + 2x
Width = 40 + 2x
Length × Width = [60+2x] × [40+2x]
4800 = 2400 + 120x + 80x + 4x²
0 = 4x² + 200x - 2400
0 = 4[x² + 50x - 600]
0 = x² + 50x - 600
0 = [x - 60] [x + 10]
x - 60 = 0 OR x + 10 = 0
x = 60 OR x = -10
We can only use the positive value of x since the context is length
Hence, x = 60
The cost of the trip was $56.25
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-4 + 4x = -pq
Add 4 to both sides
4x = -pq + 4
Divide both sides by 4
x = 
Answer:
A two story home might use translation to have both floors identical and most homes have windows of the same size and shape so they might also use translation. Sometimes buildings use reflection to make rooms opposite each other the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
SAS Postulate
Step-by-step explanation:
The contributors to the proof are listed in the left column. They consist of a congruent Side, a congruent Angle, and a congruent Side. The SAS Postulate is an appropriate choice.