All categories

3 years ago

Select the three equations that have the same solution.

Mathematics

1 answer:

frozen [14]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

B,C,D

Step-by-step explanation:

B= solve your equation step-by-step.

1.75

Step 1: Multiply both sides by 1.75.

1.75

(

1.75

)*(1.75)=(4)*(1.75)

y=7

----------------------------------------------------------

C= solve your equation step-by-step.

5y=35

Step 1: Divide both sides by 5.

$\frac{5y}{5}$ = $\frac{35}{5}$

Thus y=7

---------------------------------------------------------

D= solve your equation step-by-step.

22+y=29

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

y+22=29

Step 2: Subtract 22 from both sides.

y+22−22=29−22

y=7

------------------------------------------------------------

You might be interested in

*MIDDLE SCHOOL*

evablogger [386]

Really fr ikr geez la we zz

5 0

3 years ago

Could you explain what the answer is and why? I am not sure of how to do this

lidiya [134]

D, because after being reflected onto itself or turning 180 degrees, you would be transforming onto itself. I hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Multiply the decimal numbers 37.4 x 2.2 =

Advocard [28]

Basically you multiply like normal and then add in the decimal point (to figure out where it goes count how many numbers are behind the decimal (in this case 2) and then count that many places from the right into your answer and that's where it goes). So here 374 x22 =8228 but when you add in the decimal you get 82.28 :)

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.

$p_2$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = $\frac{31}{2823}$ = 0.011

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = $\frac{16}{7765}$ = 0.002

$n_1$ = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

$n_2$ = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }$

= 4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, Margin of error (E) = $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }$