Answer:
The correct response is "for the carryover or carryforward year".
Explanation:
- NOL usually happens that whenever a taxpayer's corporate taxable income exceeds his corporation yearly revenue. The whole NOL could be utilized to back split from several other taxable incomes, which have become perhaps throughout the future, in other words, managed to carry forward.
- Throughout the current environment, and there'll be revenue, NOL would be adapted and the tax burden would be whittled down either by NOL proportion.
Answer:
d. Firm A will spend $4,000.
Explanation:
Since Firm B cost of Cleanup before it gets the the river is less than the cost of pollution permits, it will choose to clean up its pollution.
However, since Firm A cleanup cost per ton ($100) is greater than the cost of the pollution permit, it will choose to buy permits.
Maximum Allowable Number of Permits=40
Therefore, Firm A will clean up 10 Tons and dump 40 Tons of Waste.
Cost =(10 Tons *$100)+(40 Tons * $75)
=$(1000+3000)
=$4000.
Firm A will spend $4000.
Answer:
B. an unfavorable balance of trade and payments
Explanation:
- The BOP or the balance of trade is defined as the net gains or net exports that make the balance of payments and is said to be favorable when the country export more and imports less and is a positive change.
- It is said to be negative when the country imports more and exports less thus unfavorable in terms of the trade and payments.
- <u>Hence it means that the country has a deficit and this can impact the services and is not good for the economic growth perspective.</u>
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Set goals, develop team structure, create a unified commitment.
