The perimeter of a rectangle = 2(l + w)
l = length
w = width
In this problem,
w = x
l = x + 30
the perimeter = 148
Let's plug our values into the perimeter formula above.
148ft = 2(x + x + 30ft)
Combine like terms.
148ft = 2(2x + 30ft)
Distribute the 2
148ft = 4x + 60
Subtract 60 from both sides
88ft = 4x
Divide both sides by 4
22ft = x
The width = x = 22ft
The length = x + 30 = 22 + 30 = 52ft
4 multiplied by x to the power of five
Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
I'm thinking you would have to add the probabilities that you choose a boy with you choose someone in the science club minus a boy in the science club. You can't count these people twice.
I'm getting 59%
(11+10-2)/32
.23 and .24 is your answer.
