1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WINSTONCH [101]
3 years ago
15

An important route to the Pacific Ocean

Social Studies
1 answer:
dexar [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Strait of Magellan is a 350-mile (570 km) channel located at the southern tip of South America, connecting the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. ... Before the opening of the Panama Canal in 1914, the Strait of Magellan was an important route for the steam ships moving between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

You might be interested in
In order for researchers to be able to say that Variable A causes Variable B, they must eliminate the possible influence of
Gwar [14]

Answer:

Confounding variable

Explanation:

The confounding variable is the variable that is extra in variables. It is not counted by the experimenter in the research experiment. With the help of confounding variables, it can be explained that it is cor-relational but in actual it is not there. This variable introduces the bias ness in the experiment.

confounding variable is the variable that affects the variable hidden on its outcome. But technically if we see confounding is not a true bias. Bias occurs when there is an occurrence of an error in data collection. In confounding variable there is positive bias occur when an association of bias is away from null and negative bias occur when it is associated with null.  

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these best describes the relationshipsame among the federal government, the states, the citizens as described in the co
noname [10]
D. The Federal Government’s powers are defined; other rights are reserved for the states and the people.
3 0
4 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLY. PLS HELP ASP
Kaylis [27]
The answer is 1
God bless you have a great day
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tucker is a graduate student who is studying identity formation. He selects a group of 5-year-olds, a group of 10-year-olds, and
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

B). A Cross-sectional research design.

Explanation:

A cross-sectional research design is demonstrated as a kind of observation study that involves the study and analysis of a representative subset from the population at a particular point of time.

In the given example, Tucker is employing 'cross-sectional research design' as he selects a representative subset('a group of 5-year-olds, a group of 10-year-olds, and a group of 15-year old) from the population at the same time for study and analysis(by interviewing them) . This implies that Tucker adopts a '<u>cross-sectional research design</u>.'

7 0
3 years ago
What would a society be like if there were no rules enacted by a body like the legislature?​
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

Without any rules and regulation in society there would most likely be anarchy and even greater corruption by the few.

It would be total anarchy.

At first it would be fine. People would get along fine. But then someone gets drunk and kills someone else. Then a third person kills the second person.

Finally, a fourth person would try to stop the fight peacefully, he would die, and then everyone would get angry at the person who killed the fourth guy (I know, it’s confusing, but stay with me), and they would kill him.

People would then realise, after the fact no one got in trouble, that they could do whatever they wanted. Large companies wouldn't Have to abide by any laws, so monopolies would occur.

Because there is no government, there would be no official currency. This means coins would be counterfeited and the economy would crash.

There would be environmental damage as well. Without any laws about game, critically endangered animals would die out, causing the ecosystem to fall apart. Overfishing would kill of entire species of fish.

Finally, only small villages would remain, as cities would be to dangerous because of all the pillaging. Seaside towns would die out as overfishing would destroy their food source. small villages would have their own governments and would survive for a couple more decades until bandits came and looted everyone.

By this point, nuclear power plants will of melted, causing extreme damage to what's left of the ecosystem. Bandits would survive the longest, because they’re nomads they'd pillage until there truly was no food left, and then the human race would die.

Hope this helps and if you could mark me as brainliest. Thanks!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Rounding decimals worksheet how was icky snerd driving his parents crazy
    15·1 answer
  • A mobilization plan allows a country to
    14·2 answers
  • The work of Muzafer Sherif was important for the development of social psychology because he
    12·1 answer
  • I’m suits at a common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed________ dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be pres
    9·1 answer
  • Name the first supreme court cases the supreme court case summary
    13·1 answer
  • The Endangered Species Act is often a center of controversy because _____. landowners are concerned that federal officials will
    7·1 answer
  • What is dibba al hisn popularly known for nowadays
    10·2 answers
  • Alaska and Texas
    8·1 answer
  • What would be the best reason for the United States to provide military aid in another country
    7·1 answer
  • the general adaptation syndrome suggests that our bodies go through three stages in responding to stress. those stages are
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!