The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
The government set standards for workplace safety
The moral majority has declined because it was based in christian values. Now that more and more people are atheist, the idea of deeply rooted morals is lessening. Though this is what America wants, it honestly is not good for the country, as we all know that morals are a very good thing to have, and letting good morals guide a country is a very good thing.
