D Bc I just did it and got it right
From the standing committee
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Given set data base has every new born child's DNA towards every passing of every other. Not meaning habing a crimjnal record puts blood and suliva but preamble DNA from birth, now rather than having to point match on criminal data, rather pre-set DNA data base on every human living or non-living.
Properly deviding DNA base still into split sections for criminal records amd clean records where clean record's are rather added/stamped when found guilty in the court of law, but then having all possible DNA sample at the touch of a button (rather should i say match) pre-liminates playing detective and running around following leads, ensuring closure towards deceased members familiy and aswell as eliminating wrongful imprisonment of non guilty members that adds unnecessary cost and reclurces towrards goverment funds etc.
Having "system that works, why fix" is not as having a system that continuously improves and sustains a flawless lrocedure rather than groping at the mids of a cold case in the hope that somewhere a light switch gets turned or a whistleblower apears is high waist of reacources and complete over kill. Given we are in a modern time where tech constantly improves to ease the human race, why not sustain a even rise in our modern living standards and consecutive growth in a that's even the slightest of possibilities.
Answer:
<em>An </em><em>amicus curiae brief</em><em> in support of a petitioner or appellant shall be filed within 30 days after the case is placed on the docket or a response is called for by the Court, whichever is later, and that time will not be extended.</em>
Answer:
nice your first question, whatever this is for I´m sure someone will come along that isn´t just here for the points
Explanation:
